An argument is going around the reproductive rights community that the new ultrasound law is state-mandated rape by instrumentation. Representative Hamilton, who supports the ultrasound bill and the authored the state's rape by instrumentation law, claims that it's a "silly" argument. It isn't rape because instruments are used during abortion anyway in this segment from KOKH Fox 25:
Hamilton seems to forget what the word "consent" means. A woman does not have the option of consenting to the ultrasound. It is state mandated. This could be construed as rape by instrumentation. Especially when the instrument looks like this: http://www.bandafix.com/files/429807s16.jpg
A woman does consent to an abortion when she chooses to have one (which could be medically induced, so instrumentation might not be used anyway). Thus it is not rape.